Backtesting Multi-Asset Portfolios for True Resilience: CDaR Optimization With Riskfolio-Lib & VectorBT

July 12, 2025
Facebook logo.
Twitter logo.
LinkedIn logo.

Backtesting Multi-Asset Portfolios for True Resilience: CDaR Optimization With Riskfolio-Lib & VectorBT

Why Conditional Drawdown at Risk Should Lead Your Portfolio Strategy

In professional investing, managing portfolio drawdown risk isn’t optional. It’s the difference between surviving financial crises and taking a career-ending hit. If you’re serious about building resilient, return-focused multi-asset portfolios, you need tools that don’t just chase alpha—they defend against sustained losses. That’s where Conditional Drawdown at Risk (CDaR) changes the game.

CDaR optimization goes further than surface-level metrics. Unlike volatility or simple max drawdown, it measures the average of your nastiest loss stretches. When you’re backtesting multi-asset portfolios, CDaR tells you how bad the pain truly gets, and for how long. If you want to minimize drawdown risk with precision, you need to move past traditional approaches and embrace risk-based portfolio optimization. The best quant investors already are.

Let’s get tactical. With Python portfolio tools like Riskfolio-Lib for allocation and vectorbt for fast, robust portfolio backtesting, you get a workflow purpose-built for real-world stress—not just theory. This guide is for professionals and sharp retail traders looking to harden their portfolio allocation strategies, cut drawdown, and build risk-adjusted returns that actually hold up.

CDaR Optimization: The Metric That Matters When Markets Break

Here’s reality: Most portfolios fall apart during crises because their managers ignore the depth and duration of losses. Sharpe ratios look great in bull markets. But Sharpe won’t help you when you’re stuck in a deep, slow-motion drawdown.

CDaR is different. It’s the only mainstream metric that spotlights the average worst-case losses over time. For multi-asset portfolio optimization, that’s what matters. You don’t want a backtest that looks great in the good years but conceals a powder keg for the next meltdown.

CDaR optimization strips away that risk. It’s direct, clinical, and puts actual loss experience front and center. Want risk-adjusted returns that hold up through 2008 or 2020? CDaR-minimized portfolios get you as close as possible.

Building a Resilient Portfolio: My Workflow With Riskfolio-Lib

Start with your asset universe. Equities, bonds, commodities, real alternatives—it’s all fair game. The more thoughtful your lineup, the better your odds at true diversification and portfolio resilience.

Riskfolio-Lib is my go-to Python tool for multi-asset portfolio optimization. The reason is simple: It lets you structure an optimization around the metrics that actually defend against drawdown—like CDaR and CVaR. No more hoping mean-variance does the job. With Riskfolio-Lib, your objective is clear: Minimize conditional drawdown at risk, under real constraints, using real data.

Set your constraints—max allocations, cash floors, regional limits. Define your lookback window. Then let the library grind out the portfolio that balances expected return against the worst stretches of pain. Don’t pad your assumptions or cherry-pick timeframes. Real drawdown management is about confronting hard truths.

Backtesting Portfolio Strategies With VectorBT—the Only Way to Know

A theoretically perfect allocation doesn’t mean anything until it faces the test of actual history. That’s why I always stress: Backtesting portfolio strategies is the real proof, not an Excel simulation that never leaves the building.

Vectorbt supercharges this process. Drop in your allocation weights. Load up your multi-asset price series—adjusted for dividends and splits. Simulate with proper trading frictions and realistic rebalancing. Now watch how the CDaR-optimized allocation behaves across long stretches of history, not just the highlight reel.

Want to see if your portfolio holds up through a financial crisis drawdown? Vectorbt’s scenario analysis lets you run it through 2008, 2020, or any period where the market punished careless risk-takers. Don’t trust a model that can’t survive the worst.

What a Real CDaR-Minimized Portfolio Delivers in Practice

When your CDaR-minimized portfolio faces live-fire testing, here’s what matters:

You’ll see drawdowns that are shallower and shorter-lived than the competition. Recovery comes faster. Consistency replaces gut-lurching reversals. You won’t get seduced by last year’s poster child because the model favors robust, repeatable performance—the kind that gets you through market storms with your capital and sanity intact.

If your backtest falls short, question your data, your constraints, your assumptions. Do your portfolio risk metrics include real costs? Was your scenario analysis realistic? Stress test. Dig into your results. Demand resilience from your allocations. There’s no trophy for having the most complicated model—only for building one that performs under stress.

Practical, Action-Ready Lessons—No Theory, Pure Experience

Your data must be clean, thorough, and bias-free. Anything less and you’ll get false confidence followed by real losses. Every rebalancing move has friction—don’t whitewash transaction costs or slippage. Simulate what will actually happen if you run these plays with real money.

Watch for overfitting. If your backtest looks perfect, throw it at new out-of-sample periods. A true risk-based portfolio optimization process should work in different markets, across different asset mixes.

CDaR minimization sometimes leads you to boring, low-volatility assets when fear spikes. That’s by design. Explain it up front—to your team, your clients, yourself. FOMO is not a portfolio strategy. Resilience is.

Why This Workflow Leaves Spreadsheets & Legacy Models in the Dust

Most traditional multi-asset portfolio strategies are built in static spreadsheets, full of hidden assumptions and no real scenario analysis. They’re flimsy. If you’re using mean-variance on a handful of assets, you’re not even seeing real drawdown risk. That’s a recipe for disaster.

Riskfolio-Lib and vectorbt transform the process. You optimize for the statistical losses that actually impact your future. You backtest every scenario that could punch a hole through your balance sheet. You build portfolios that are robust, not just lucky.

If you want fewer sleepless nights and more consistent returns, use this process. It’s what I use with my own capital, and what I’d recommend to any professional looking to stand the test of time.

Action Steps—How I Build Portfolio Resilience With Python

Here’s how you should approach it:

First, define your asset universe and secure high-quality data. Put enough diversification in the mix to let portfolio optimization actually work. Clean, accurate series are a requirement.

Next, plug into Riskfolio-Lib. Structure an optimization to minimize CDaR. Set smart, defensible constraints. Don’t get fancy at first. Simplicity is robust.

Run the optimization. Export the weights.

Then, bring those weights into vectorbt. Backtest across deep historical periods—especially those with real market stress. Test different rebalancing and friction settings, not just the easiest scenario.

Keep iterating. Never settle for a portfolio that’s only strong in the easy years. Challenge your results. If something fails during a crisis, fix it before your real money is on the line.

Keep Climbing: The Best Resources on Portfolio Risk and Backtesting

Learning never stops. If you want to push deeper into drawdown management and portfolio resilience, these resources are my recommendations:

  1. The Riskfolio-Lib documentation is the hub for risk-based portfolio optimization—covers every metric and constraint you’ll want in practice.
  2. VectorBT’s site walks you through portfolio backtesting in Python from the ground up, with practical, detailed guides on scenario testing.
  3. “Quantitative Risk Management” by McNeil, Frey, and Embrechts. Hands down, the best technical reference for why metrics like CDaR matter in real portfolios.
  4. “Practical Portfolio Performance Measurement and Attribution” by Carl Bacon. A field-tested guide to measuring what counts when it comes to returns vs. risk.
  5. Keep scanning new research—arXiv and SSRN are full of papers on risk-based portfolio strategies and drawdown management, often years before you’ll see it in a textbook.

Build your process. Don’t compromise on data, discipline, or diligence. CDaR optimization with Python portfolio tools is how you’ll stand up to real-world chaos—and come out stronger.